Monthly Archives: September 2004

Cuban’s Rules for Success

Mark Cuban writes about the twelve factors of success in his blog. Read the post for all twelve. My favorite is:

11. Pigs Get Fat, Hogs Get Slaughtered. This is one I got from my partner Todd Wagner. He is right on. Sometimes you have to go for the jugular, but more often than not, the biggest mistake people make are getting too greedy. Every good deal has a win win solution. There is nothing I hate more than someone who tries to squeeze every last penny out of the deal. They often raise the aggrevation level to the point where it’s not worth doing the deal. They also raise the dislike level to the point where even if a deal gets done, you look for ways to never do business with that person or company again.

Business happens over years and years. Value is measured in the total upside of a business relationship, not by how much you squeezed out in any one deal.

If you are a lawyer reading this post, think about Cuban’s advice in the context of your relationships with your clients. Do you really need to turn your copy machine into a profit center? Does every single minute of time spent thinking about a client’s case need to show up on the bill? Several days ago a client complained to me about her previous attorney. She said that she would call the attorney to find out when the project he was working for her on would be done (it was already several weeks overdue), and she would get billed for the phone call! The $37.50 per call did not matter to the client financially, but she became so aggravated she not only switched lawyers, but tells everyone she knows about her experience.

Great Excerpts from Business Books

I love reading business books. I find they often give me great ideas I can incorporate into my practice. The people over at 800-CEO-READ have started an Excerpt Blog with — you guessed it — excerpts from some books they sell. It has an RSS feed too! Check it out.

Highland, Illinois Real Estate

Warning, rant ahead.

I’ve been blackballed by the Highland, Illinois realtors! I’ve been doing the deeds for a local title company. It was a nice bit of business for my firm, and the title company enjoyed working with us because we provided the deeds and other work to them much more quickly then the attorney who used to do the work — resulting in fewer cancelled closings and happier customers.

However, once the local realtors found out I was doing the deeds, they went to the title company and said (allegedly), “If Matt Homann continues to do the deeds, we’ll use a different title company.” The reason? Because I’ve told people that, if they have a willing buyer, I can do their real estate sales documents and advise them through the closing for far less than the 6% commission our local realtors charge. Apparently not happy with their commission on 99% of the real estate transactions in a growing real estate market that happen here without any lawyers at all, the realtors are threatened by me helping my home-selling clients (who already have a buyer!) with their transaction.

The funny thing is that the realtors could build so much more good will by encouraging sellers with willing buyers to bypass the real estate system and see an attorney! If a realtor told me how to save thousands of dollars on my transaction, I’d recommend that realtor to everyone I knew. And if a realtor referred clients to me, I’d reciprocate, and send a lot of business their way.

I’ve not decided how to respond, if at all, to the realtors. Some friends and collegues have urged me to sue, but I don’t think I’m up for that. However, I do know this, when I sell my house soon, don’t look for a realtor’s sign in the front yard.

Real Estate Lawyers — Pay Attention!

Two from Michele Miller in the same day! Michele links to this white paper authored by Real Living, a growing nationwide real estate company. The paper is a must-read for any real estate lawyer. Here are some excerpts:

Historically, consumers relied on real estate professionals for almost all information concerning the buying and selling of a home – a transaction model which positioned real estate professionals primarily as information disseminators. According to Real Living, women now rely on the Internet to gather information upfront, often before contacting a real estate agent. However, women who are short on time and long on needs place a high value on the agent to guide them through the home buying process once they have used the Internet to educate themselves and narrow down their home search criteria. This shift in behavior now positions real estate professionals as negotiators, time-savers and efficiency experts – demanding that brokers and agents find new, innovative ways to serve consumer needs for convenience and control.

Real Living advises that brokers and agents of the future must fully integrate technology into their normal course of business in order to maintain a competitive edge with today’s increasingly connected consumer. Key suggestions outlined in the white paper include:* Offer anywhere, anytime access to robust listing information (such as property details, virtual tours and mapping) to drive efficiency, convenience and control for consumers

* Deliver online customer communication, comparables and transaction forms to add value to the agent-consumer relationship.

* Leverage the Web as a real-time-marketing medium to provide home buyers with immediate access to all homes available for sale on the market.

* Target female decision makers through integrated, robust Internet marketing strategies supplemented by traditional advertising mediums such as print, radio and television.

* Meet consumer needs for efficiency and convenience by serving as a source for one-stop-shopping referrals for related services such as mortgage, title, relocation and home warranty services.

These tips are not only for real estate agents. This is sound advice for lawyers too.

It’s official! The [non]billable hour is a time waster!

I was checking out my referral logs today for the first time in a few weeks, and found several incoming hits from Google to this post. Google “Time Waster” and you’ll find that this blog has cracked the top ten for that term!

I know my wife has called it that before, but now it’s official.

Site Maintenance

Thanks to an astute reader (thanks Fred!), I’ve found that my archive links to most of my Five by Five’s aren’t working. I’ll try to get that fixed today, along with a new “Look what I found!” list on the sidebar.

Still Not Marketing to Women?

Michele Miller of Wonderbranding points to two interesting statistics she saw in this Business Journal article. The amazing stats:

85 percent of women will at some point in their lives be solely responsible for their homes,

and

90 percent of women will be solely responsible for their finances at some point in their lives.

Now, how are you tailoring your services to help these women? For some great advice, go here, here, here, here, or here.

Value Pricing: Real World Example 1

Anyone who reads the blog knows how little I think about the billable hour.  Until now, I haven’t given very many examples about how we are using "service pricing" in our business.  Here is one way abandoning the billable hour has created "win-win" for us and one client (and yes, I’ve gotten permission from them to post this example on my blog).

First, the basics.  A client has a development zoned for multi-family housing and is currently building about twenty duplexes (forty units) with sixty more ready to go.  Originally, the developer believed that the market existed for selling each duplex to one owner — who would then rent out one side and live in the other, or rent out both sides.  However, economic conditions have made it more profitable to sell each side to different owners — something currently prohibited by local zoning ordinances.

The obvious choice is to turn the development into condominiums.  This allows individual ownership of each duplex side without violating local regulations.  However, because all of the units aren’t yet built, to "condominiumize" all of the duplexes into one large development, the developer will have to do so in phases (as many as twenty).  Each time a new phase is ready, the declaration of condominium (a legal document setting out ownership interests and voting rights among the duplex owners) and the plat will have to be amended.  So far, so good.  However, the developers want the maintenance of each unit to be shared only between the owners of each duplex, and not collectively among all of the units as often happens in a traditional condominum setting.

Normally, we would do the work and bill by the hour.  Since this is a novel kind of project for us, we could easily spend between twenty and fifty hours drafting the first declaration of condominium.  Gaining approval from local and county governments could easily double that investiment of time.  Amending the declarations and plat each time a new phase is ready would likely add five to ten hours again. 

When we laid out the time and cost to our clients, they balked.  Asking them to pay us thousands of dollars for work to prepare the condominium documents was not an option to them, so we proposed a different arrangement.  For $X00.00 per unit (two per duplex), we will do all of the documents necessary to condominiumize the entire development.  We will be paid each time a unit sells (and not before), and do as many phases as are necessary until construction is complete.  The developer bears all the filing and recording fees, but is not out of pocket a single dime for the legal work, and will likely pass the unit fee on to the purchaser of the condominium. 

Now for the best part:  The developer loves the idea.  By eliminating the up-front cost, the developers are able to plow previously-budgeted legal costs into subdivision improvements.  We will make two to three times the amount we would make if billed on an hourly basis, but only if all of the units sell.  And while it may take some time for the development to close, we’ve secured an income stream for the firm for at least two years.  And, we will likely be retained to represent the condominium owner’s association once the requisite number of units have sold.  We’ve been representing other owners associations for a set monthly fee of $X.00 per lot per month.

We love it, the developers love it, and the home buyers will realize significant benefits as well.

 

I’m Back, and Think Tank Tuesdays

Sorry for the posting blackout. A family emergency (resolved) and a crush of new business has kept me out of the blogging loop for nearly two weeks. Think Tank Tuesday will be rescheduled from today (September 14) and the regular blogging will resume with several longer posts I’ve been working on during my hiatus. I also have some really big personal and professional developments I’ll share soon.

Vacation Time

Sorry for the lack of updates. I’m taking a little personal time, but will be back on Friday.

LegalMatch, Compared

I haven’t posted about LegalMatch for several months, though my LegalMatch posts continue to draw comments weekly.   In a comment to my initial “Why I’ll Never use Legal Match” post, reader Maury gives an unbelievably complete summary of all of the legal referral sites out there, along with his “grades” for visibility and cost. 

Maury appears to work for a lawyer referral service himself, but the information seems pretty reliable.  If you are looking for a comprehensive comparison of most (if not all) of the legal referral web sites out there (and Maury covers over 100 of them!), scroll down through the comments to the LegalMatch post.  Thanks Maury!