On Pricing Strategically

This is a tremendous article on Pricing Strategy for Creatives (written by the Chief Innovation Officer of an accountancy firm) that is spot-on for everyone struggling with pricing their services (including lawyers).  Please read it.

Here are some excerpts on becoming strategic about pricing:

1. Price by the service, not by the hour. Though very normal for the creative professions, one of the most non-strategic things you can do is to charge by the hour. Why do you charge by the hour? You may have read about charging by the hour in a book, seen your previous firm do it, or heard a friend say that’s how you were supposed to do it. 

2. Slow down your sales process. Slow down how, when, and who you take on as clients. You need time to determine a client’s needs before you price their projects. You must know what outcomes they desire. Diving into a project with a minimalist contract that speaks to your hourly rate will not let you know when your client is truly ecstatic about your work. And the only reason to serve clients is to bring great value to them and make them extremely happy!

3. Inject value into your client’s experience with your service. You simply have to charge more. That is a totally strategic move, and one you can’t do unless you have the guts to do it. But you can’t charge more for crap. It’s a little known secret that you can charge not only for your creative work, but for the client experience around the work you deliver. In essence, you can price things that have nothing to do with design, but have everything to do with the experience your client encountered throughout the process of engaging with you on their project.

There’s more in the article about establishing a better client intake process and charging what you’re worth.  My favorite part, though, the author’s discussion on how to have the “value vs. price” conversation with your potential client:

For example, you can ask a client “what is the greatest outcome you can imagine from my work with your company?” Maybe they’ll say “I want your work to be so effective that we sell 15 to 20 percent more products compared to this same time last year.” Now you can attach your price to their outcomes. So you might say, “My base price is $50,000, but if you sell between 15 and 20 percent more products than this time last year, then I will receive a bonus payment of 5 percent on your additional sales.” This links what you get paid directly to outcomes. And the clients won’t mind paying if you helped them sell more stuff. Everybody’s happy!

A great read.

2 Responses to On Pricing Strategically
  1. [...] Strategy that is spot-on for everyone struggling with pricing their services (including lawyers).Via http://www.nonbillablehour.com /* 0 Comments – Leave a comment! « Previous [...]

  2. Steve
    February 25, 2012 | 8:43 pm

    Matt:

    I know that you’re very much in favor of eliminating the billable hour and replacing it with a “value” or “service” based revenue model. I agree, in theory, and am just as averse to the billable hour as you are. However, the the problem is that, at least in transactional practice, it’s very difficult to estimate how much time and expertise a particular transaction will take, and what skill sets will be required as the transaction proceeds. Much depends on counterparty’s counsel and much often depends on regulatory approvals and other third party issues.

    So, taking on a corporate transaction becomes an exercise in ambiguity. There simply isn’t a “typical” transaction that takes a “typical” or readily-determinable amount of time or a readily determinable skill set. I can offer my clients a flat fee for a transaction, but if the other side becomes difficult or dilatory, or if due diligence or third party issues take much longer than I originally thought or involves legal skills and issues we didn’t anticipate, then I find myself not only incurring opportunity costs (for new work I have to forego) but also incurring time and expertise that I didn’t anticipate having to incur at the outset of the transaction.

    For this reason, I believe it’s difficult to eliminate the concept of the billable hour for corporate transactional work. But I want to be wrong. Do you have any thoughts?

Leave a Reply

Wanting to leave an <em>phasis on your comment?

Trackback URL http://www.nonbillablehour.com/2012/02/on-pricing-strategically.html/trackback